A quick 30-minute intro call to understand your objectives and whether we’re the right team for you.
We’ll be in touch soon to arrange your discovery call.
No retainer commitment. No junior analysts. No generic recommendations. Just the truth about your marketing operation — and what to do about it.
Fill in the application below. Our senior team reviews every submission personally.
If there’s a clear fit, you’ll hear back within 48 hours to book a 20-minute kick-off call.
We run a limited number of audits each month — not every application proceeds.
Every sale through an aggregator ends the same way. They keep the email, the consent, the behaviour, the rebook. You get an invoice and a stranger, and next year you pay to reach the same person again.
We build the asset that ends that: your buyer’s signals, captured at every touchpoint, consented properly, connected into one record, and put to work in your targeting, your algorithms and your retention.
They’ll sell you placement. They’ll sell you leads. But the thing that makes acquisition cheaper every year, knowing exactly who buys, why, and what they’re worth, stays on their side of the wall. That’s not an accident. It’s their business model.
Building your own is less glamorous than a campaign and worth more than most of them. Here’s what it looks like:
Media spend stops when you stop paying. This doesn’t.
Most of our sales come through aggregators. We barely have any customer data to start with.
That’s precisely the situation this is built for, and the answer is to start capturing before the sale. The guide someone downloads, the calculator they use, the quote they start, the call they make: every one is a signal you can own even when the transaction happens elsewhere. Brands in your position don’t have a data problem. They have a capture problem, and capture is fixable in weeks.
What does first-party data actually do for acquisition? It sounds like a retention thing.
It’s the sharpest acquisition tool you can own. Your customer list seeds the lookalikes, so the algorithm hunts for buyers, not browsers. Your conversion data flows back through CAPI, so every platform optimises to real sales instead of clicks. Your LTV data tells you which customers are worth paying more for. Retention is the bonus. Targeting is the point.
We're in a regulated category. Doesn't privacy law make all this harder?
It makes it more valuable. The rules killed the shortcuts, third-party lists, borrowed audiences, tracking nobody agreed to, which means properly consented data is now the scarcest asset in your category. We build consent-first: clear value exchange, compliance sign-off in the process, every record usable without a lawyer wincing. In healthcare and insurance, that’s not a constraint. It’s the moat.
Our data exists but it's scattered across five systems that don't talk.
The most common starting point there is. The fix is the single customer view: CRM, campaign data, quotes and sales history joined into one record per human. It’s rarely a new-tools problem, almost always a plumbing one, and it’s the unlock for everything else on this page. You can’t activate what you can’t connect.
How long before this is actually worth something?
The audit takes days and the capture fixes take weeks, so the asset starts growing almost immediately. The compounding is what you’re really buying: every month adds signal, every signal sharpens the targeting, every campaign gets cheaper than the last. Which is also the honest warning. Every month you wait is a month of your customers’ data accruing to someone else’s balance sheet.
Can't the platforms just do this for us with their AI targeting?
The platforms’ AI is only as good as what you feed it, and fed on pixels alone it optimises toward whoever clicks cheapest. Feed it your actual customer data, real buyers, real values, real outcomes, and the same AI hunts for people worth having. First-party data isn’t an alternative to platform intelligence. It’s the difference between renting it and directing it.
